I've been working with my team on how to adopt AI, and I've reached an important conclusion. The companies that succeed with AI won't be those with the best tools, but those with the most thoughtful humans guiding and championing the transformation.

Our team spans the AI spectrum. Some are experimenting with ChatGPT for everything, while a few are skeptical about whether AI can help, and many are in the middle, being curious but cautious. And this is a common starting point for any transformational change.

There's no playbook for this. I found myself synthesizing conflicting advice from other companies' AI rollouts, reading between the lines of my team's concerns and excitement, and designing a framework that balanced structured training with hands-on experimentation, including prompt contests, hackathons, and champion networks. Every decision required weighing factors no algorithm could process: team culture, individual comfort levels, and the delicate balance between empowerment and overwhelm.

What I discovered is that leading with human empowerment, not just tool efficiency, creates the positive buzz that drives adoption. But it required drawing on emotional intelligence to understand unspoken concerns, critical thinking to discern what was relevant for our specific culture, and creative problem-solving to design an approach that felt authentic rather than imposed.

This experience taught me something crucial: the human capabilities I’m drawing on to lead this transformation (emotional intelligence, critical thinking, creative problem-solving) aren't just for developing teams or leading change. They're the foundation that makes anyone irreplaceable in an AI world.

Learning AI skills, such as prompt engineering, is undoubtedly essential to leverage the AI we have today, but fundamentally human skills will be what sets us apart in how we work with AI tomorrow.

Why This Is Different From Common AI Advice

Most "future of work" guidance focuses on becoming better AI users. This framework is about becoming irreplaceable humans.

Common AI-Survival Advice vs. Your Irreplaceable Stack

• Learn to prompt better → Learn to think better

• Automate more tasks → Feel, connect, and judge more deeply

• Stay productive → Stay human and wise

• Master AI tools → Develop capacities AI can't replicate

• Work faster → Create unique value

• Optimize efficiency → Build authentic relationships

• Generate content → Generate original insights

The Problem with Tool-Focused Advice: Everyone will learn to use AI tools well. That's table stakes. The competitive advantage goes to people who've developed the human capacities that become MORE valuable when everyone has access to the same AI capabilities.

This Framework: Instead of just learning to collaborate with AI, you're building the distinctly human capabilities that make you irreplaceable, whether AI exists or not.

But here's what I've discovered: developing these human capacities doesn't just make you more human; it makes you better at working with AI.

Better humans = better AI use.

The Building Metaphor

Just like developers intentionally build "tech stacks" (layers of technologies that work together), we need to develop our "human stack": the combination of capacities that makes us uniquely valuable in an AI world. While the term 'stack' sounds technical, think of it as a living framework for intentionally cultivating the interconnected layers of your innate humanity.

Your irreplaceable stack isn't just one skill. It's the unique combination of human capabilities that, when developed together, create something no AI can replicate: the integrated wisdom that comes from emotional depth, clear thinking, authentic relationships, meaningful purpose, and creative courage working in harmony.

Quick Stack Assessment: Which Layer Needs Your Attention?

Before we dive into the framework, take this quick assessment to identify where to focus your development efforts.

Take the Assessment

Rate yourself 1-5 on each statement (1=rarely, 5=consistently):

Spark – Emotional Intelligence & Presence

• I can stay calm and grounded when others are emotional [1-5]

• I trust my gut when data is ambiguous [1-5]

• People seek me out when they need genuine support [1-5]

• I notice my emotional patterns and use them as information [1-5]

Clarity – Critical Thinking & Discernment

• I question AI outputs rather than accepting them at face value [1-5]

• I can sit with complex problems without rushing to solutions [1-5]

• I seek out perspectives that challenge my thinking [1-5]

• I recognize my own biases and thinking patterns [1-5]

Connection – Empathy, Trust & Relational Skill

• People feel genuinely heard when they talk to me [1-5]

• I can sense what others need without them saying it [1-5]

• I create environments where people feel safe to disagree [1-5]

• I ask questions that help others (and myself) think more clearly [1-5]

Purpose – Meaning-Making & Wisdom

• I find meaningful patterns across my different experiences [1-5]

• I have clarity about my core values in difficult situations [1-5]

• I help others make sense of their challenges [1-5]

• I regularly reflect on what I'm learning about life and work [1-5]

Action – Creative Expression & Problem Solving

• I think strategically about how to approach complex problems before acting [1-5]

• I make unexpected connections between unrelated ideas [1-5]

• I generate creative solutions to complex problems [1-5]

• I take meaningful risks for things I believe in [1-5]

Your lowest-scoring layer is where to start building. Your highest-scoring layer is your current superpower. Lean into into your superpower while developing the others.

Take the Assessment

The Five-Layer Framework: Spark → Clarity → Connection → Purpose → Action

Each layer builds upon the previous ones, enhancing your collaboration with AI.

Here's how they work together:

Layer 1: Spark – Emotional Intelligence & Presence

What you're building: The ability to recognize emotional patterns, stay present under pressure, trust your intuition, be vulnerable, and regulate your emotions while remaining genuine.

Why it's irreplaceable: AI can simulate emotional responses, but it cannot feel emotions or provide the kind of authentic presence that emerges from genuine human experiences. When someone is in crisis, they need more than just optimal information—they need someone who can genuinely be with them in their difficulty.

How it enhances AI collaboration: Your emotional intelligence enables you to craft more nuanced prompts for sensitive topics, recognize when AI responses lack emotional appropriateness, and know when human presence is required over AI assistance. You become the emotional quality control for AI interactions.

Example capability: Presence Under Pressure. While AI can provide crisis management protocols, only humans can offer the authentic presence that stabilizes people during emotional turmoil. This capacity becomes more valuable as AI handles routine emotional support, allowing humans to focus on the moments that truly matter.

Quick practice: The Emotional De-escalator. Before sending a reactive or emotionally charged email, paste your draft into an AI. Use this prompt:

This is a draft email I wrote while feeling [angry/anxious/etc]. My goal is to [resolve the issue/get a clear answer]. Please help me rewrite this message to be more calm, professional, and effective for achieving my goal, while still clearly addressing the core problem.

This practice uses AI as a "cooling off" mechanism, allowing you to see a more regulated version of your thoughts and teaching you how to reframe communication constructively under pressure.

Layer 2: Clarity – Critical Thinking & Discernment

What you're building: The ability to evaluate AI outputs, navigate complex problems, synthesize conflicting information, maintain meta-cognitive awareness, and make sound judgments in ambiguous situations.

Why it's irreplaceable: AI processes existing patterns but struggles with novel contexts, ethical judgment, and the kind of nuanced discernment that comes from lived experience. As AI becomes more sophisticated, its errors become more subtle; your ability to spot them becomes increasingly critical.

How it enhances AI collaboration: You become an expert AI collaborator who can spot hallucinations, recognize when AI responses miss crucial context, and serve as quality control and strategic director for AI tools rather than just a passive user.

Example capability: AI Output Evaluation. As AI improves at generating plausible-sounding content, your ability to critically assess accuracy, bias, and missing perspectives becomes increasingly essential. This goes beyond just “using AI” to directing it with wisdom.

Quick Practice: The Hidden Assumption Hunter. Take a piece of writing (an article you agree with, a company memo, or even your own argument) and paste it into an AI. Use the prompt:

Please analyze the following text. What are the key unstated assumptions or hidden premises that this argument relies on to be true? List them as bullet points.

It encourages you to look beyond the surface of any argument and assess its foundational logic, a vital skill in identifying potential gaps in the argument.

Layer 3: Connection – Empathy, Trust & Relational Skill

What you're building: The ability to listen deeply, ask thoughtful questions that spark insight, build genuine trust, understand unspoken needs, create psychological safety, facilitate difficult conversations, and bridge cultural differences.

Why it's irreplaceable: Authentic empathy and meaningful communication require shared human experience, genuine care for wellbeing, and the courage to be vulnerable. These qualities emerge from lived experience, not programming. As interactions become more digital, authentic human connection and thoughtful communication become scarce and valuable.

How it enhances AI collaboration: Your communication and relational skills enable you to co-create content with AI that genuinely resonates with human audiences. You understand what people actually need, not just what they say they want. You can facilitate human-AI collaboration and ensure AI-assisted communication serves genuine understanding.

Example capability: Deep Listening & Inquiry. We all know AI can process words and even analyze sentiment, but it can't engage in the kind of deep listening that helps people feel truly understood. It can't ask the thoughtful questions that help others clarify their thinking. Your ability to listen for what's not being said and ask questions that spark insight becomes increasingly valuable as AI handles surface-level communication.

Quick practice: The Empathy Role-Play. Before a difficult conversation, use an AI to practice. Give it a persona and a scenario. Try this prompt:

I need to tell my team that we are delaying a project launch by one month. I want you to act as a senior engineer on my team who is feeling burnt out and frustrated. I will start the conversation, and you respond as you think they would. Help me practice delivering this news with empathy.

This allows you to anticipate reactions and refine your messaging in a low-stakes environment.

Layer 4: Purpose – Meaning-Making & Wisdom

What you're building: The ability to recognize patterns across experience, make values-based decisions, construct meaning from complexity, transmit wisdom to others, and provide cultural and historical context.

Why it's irreplaceable: Wisdom emerges from the integration of lived experience, reflection, and values—it cannot be downloaded or programmed. AI can provide information, but cannot share the kind of integrated understanding that comes from learning through both success and suffering.

How it enhances AI collaboration: Your wisdom guides ethical AI use—you can recognize when AI applications serve human flourishing vs. just efficiency, ensure outputs align with deeper values, and help organizations implement AI in ways that enhance human dignity.

Example capability: Values-Based Decision Making. AI can optimize for efficiency, but cannot make ethical judgments about what should be optimized. As AI capabilities expand, human judgment about the ethical application of AI becomes increasingly critical.

Quick practice: The Sense-Making Engine. Think of a current complex or confusing situation at work. Open a new Google document and gather all the raw information you have about the situation. Include snippets from emails, key quotes from meetings, your own personal observations, and any conflicting data points or opinions. Then feed this "data dump" to an AI with the prompt:

Review this document with raw, unstructured information about a complex situation I'm working through. Please act as a strategic advisor. First, synthesize this information and identify the 3-5 most important underlying themes or forces. Second, based on those themes, propose three different and plausible narratives that explain 'the story of what's happening here.' Give each narrative a memorable name to help me understand the different lenses.

This practice trains you to find clarity in chaos, using AI as a partner to organize complex information and frame insightful interpretations.

Layer 5: Action – Creative Expression & Problem Solving

What you're building: The ability to think strategically about how to approach complex problems, make innovative connections, solve ambiguous problems, facilitate collaborative ideation, develop aesthetic judgment, and take meaningful risks based on values and vision.

Why it's irreplaceable: Human creativity and strategic thinking emerge from the unique intersection of lived experience, emotional depth, values, and the willingness to take meaningful risks. While AI can follow established methodologies and combine existing elements, it struggles with selecting the right approach for novel situations and making the kind of intuitive leaps that come from diverse human experiences.

How it enhances AI collaboration: You can think strategically about when and how to involve AI in complex challenges, direct AI toward novel possibilities it wouldn't discover alone, provide the aesthetic judgment and taste that AI lacks, and take the meaningful risks required to turn AI-assisted ideas into breakthrough innovations.

Example capability: Strategic Problem Framing. Before AI can help solve a problem, someone needs to think about what kind of problem it actually is and what approach might work best. Your ability to step back and ask "How should we think about this challenge?" becomes essential as AI handles more of the execution while humans need to provide the strategic direction.

Quick practice: The Vision Accelerator. If you have a vague idea for a project, use an AI to make it feel more real and actionable. Here’s the prompt:

"I have a rough idea for an internal company' knowledge fair' to help teams share what they're working on. Act as my creative partner. Let's brainstorm. Give me 10 catchy names for the event, 5 potential formats it could take (e.g., TED-style talks, science fair booths), and 3 fun ways we could market it internally."

This turns an abstract thought into a set of concrete possibilities, dramatically lowering the barrier to taking the first step.

How the Stack Works Together

These layers don't just add up; they multiply. Someone with deep emotional intelligence makes better critical thinking decisions. Someone with strong relational skills can synthesize wisdom more effectively. Someone with clear purpose takes more meaningful creative risks.

Most importantly, each layer enhances how you work with AI:

• Spark helps you know when to involve AI vs. when to show up personally

• Clarity makes you an expert AI collaborator rather than a passive user

• Connection enables AI-assisted work that serves genuine human needs

• Purpose guides AI use toward meaningful rather than just efficient outcomes

• Action combines AI capabilities with human creativity for breakthrough innovation

Your irreplaceable stack becomes the foundation for collaborative intelligence. We move from human vs. AI to humans and AI working together in ways that amplify the best of both.

What This Means for You

In five years, the most valuable professionals won't be those who can use AI tools the fastest. They'll be those who've developed the human capabilities that make AI collaboration more effective and more meaningful.

These aren't "soft skills" that become less important as technology advances. They're the core capabilities that become MORE valuable as AI handles routine cognitive and creative tasks.

The people who build these capabilities intentionally and develop their irreplaceable stack will find themselves increasingly indispensable: not despite AI, but because of how well they can work with it.

Coming Up in This Series

Over the following five articles, we'll dive deep into each layer of your irreplaceable stack:

• Part 1: Spark – How to develop emotional intelligence and authentic presence that makes you irreplaceable in an AI world

• Part 2: Clarity – Building critical thinking and discernment that makes you an expert AI collaborator

• Part 3: Connection – Developing empathy, trust, and relational skills that enable AI-assisted work to serve genuine human connection

• Part 4: Purpose – Cultivating meaning-making and wisdom that guides ethical and meaningful AI use

• Part 5: Action – Mastering creative expression and problem-solving that combines AI capabilities with human innovation

Each article will include specific practices, real-world examples, and detailed guidance for developing these capabilities in your daily work and life.

Subscribe now

Your Next Step

Take the assessment above and reflect on the results. Where did you score lowest? What could you do to improve in this area? You're not building these capabilities to compete with AI. You're building them to become the kind of human who can collaborate with AI in ways that create outcomes neither could achieve alone.

Take the Assessment

The future belongs to people who are irreplaceably human and expertly collaborative with AI. The question isn't whether to develop these capabilities—it's whether you'll develop them intentionally or leave your irreplaceable stack to chance.

What does your irreplaceable stack look like? Which layer calls to you first?

Take the assessment, pick your starting point, and begin building the human capabilities that will make you more valuable—and more human—in an AI world.

Share

Leave a comment

Even into adulthood, I never questioned this assumption. Well past my schooling years, I strived to protect the tranquility of my home office as a place to sit, notebook open and highlighter ready, to delve into new topics.

Then a couple months ago, while walking around my neighborhood with AirPods in. I stumbled on a new way to learn that, while not a replacement for studying a good book, was an entirely new (and largely undiscovered) tool in our learning toolboxes.

I learned how the power of movement and conversation can become an almost magical unlock for learning.

What I Discovered Walking in My Neighborhood

I've been geeking out on neuroscience lately. After listening to an interesting podcast segment that touched on how social media use activated parts of the autonomic nervous system, I wanted to dive a little deeper.

I opened ChatGPT, started a new conversation in voice mode, put the phone in my pocket, and asked it: "how does the autonomic nervous system work?"

I'm not a neuroscientist and will never pretend to be. I just wanted to learn more.

To be honest, the first answer it gave me used a lot of terms I wasn't yet familiar with.

So one by one, I asked follow up questions.

Getting deeper into understanding the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. Deeply interested in how the use of social media and always-on notifications keeps our brains in a constant low-level state of "fight or flight."

My curiosity was activated in ways I hadn't felt in months. I was deeply engaged.

The act of walking seemed to activate my brain in new ways.

My thinking was clearer. I asked better questions.

I asked ChatGPT to re-explain things in different ways. I asked it to explain things in more basic terms. I asked it to use analogies.

The point is, I kept the conversation going. So long, in fact, that my 30 minute walk became 45 minutes. Then an hour. And finally at almost 90 minutes in, I felt like I had what I needed to start sketching out some ideas.

The real insight though, was the powerful combination of:

• Engaging AI as a thought partner

• Discussing at the speed of thought (or voice) rather than typing

• Activating my own brain through movement

Subscribe now

The Science of Learning and Walking

It turns out that my experience is supported by research. Cognitive function improves with movement, especially the kind of mild, rhythmic exercise that walking offers.

Studies show that walking increases the production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), often called "Miracle-Gro for the brain." This protein enhances neuroplasticity, the ability of your brain to create new neural connections.

Translation: as you walk, you're actually creating better learning pathways.

According to research by Marily Oppezzo of Stanford, walking boosts creative thinking by 60% on average. What caught my attention, though, was that the increase in creative thinking continued even after people sat back down.

Walking not only improves your thinking in the here and now, but it also prepares your brain for improved thinking afterwards.

Additionally, environmental psychologists Rachel and Stephen Kaplan discovered that certain environments can restore our ability to pay attention intently without requiring it. Settings such as the mild, varied stimulation of a neighborhood walk allow your brain to rest its directed attention systems while keeping it gently engaged.

When you combine this cognitive state with conversation (in this case with AI), something interesting emerges.

Through conversation and movement, you're actively co-creating understanding rather than merely passively absorbing information.

The AI Walking Tutorial: How It Works

Here's the simple framework I've developed after experimenting with this approach:

Setup (5 minutes):

• Block 30-45 minutes on your calendar

• Pick a topic you're genuinely curious about

• Put ChatGPT (or your preferred AI) in voice mode

• Grab earbuds and head outside

Launch (First 5 minutes):

• Start with "Explain [your topic] to me"

• Let AI give you the overview

• Don't worry about taking notes—just listen and walk

Engage (20-30 minutes):
This is where the magic happens. Don't stop at the first answer. Ask follow-ups. Lots of them:

• "Can you simplify that?"

• "What's a good analogy for this concept?"

• "What am I not asking that I should be?"

• "How does this connect to [related concept]?"

• "Give me an example of this in everyday life"

• "What would happen if this system failed?"

Consolidate (Final 5 minutes):
End with active recall:

• "Quiz me on what we just covered."

• “Here are my key takeaways…”

This last step is crucial.

Active recall, which requires your brain to retrieve information rather than merely recognize it, is one of the most effective techniques according to cognitive science research.

Having AI test your understanding while you're still walking cements the learning in a way that passive listening cannot.

How This Differs from Desk Learning

The combination of movement and conversation creates a unique learning environment that's fundamentally different from traditional study methods:

1. Physical Movement Enhances Mental Movement: Walking creates a gentle rhythm that seems to unlock more fluid thinking. Your questions become more natural, more exploratory. Instead of the rigid Q&A format that often happens at a desk, you find yourself in genuine conversation.

2. Reduced Performance Pressure: There's no notebook to fill, no perfect notes to take. This reduces the performance anxiety that can interfere with learning. You're free to be curious without worrying about capturing everything perfectly.

3. Natural Conversational Flow: Voice-based AI interaction feels more like talking to a knowledgeable friend than querying a database. Learning feels more interesting and memorable because this social component engages different neural pathways than reading or typing. And the conversation happens fluidly, closer to the speed of thought, rather than being inhibited by the speed of our fingers or thumbs.

4. Environmental Enrichment: The varied but gentle stimulation of a neighborhood walk—changing scenery, natural sounds, fresh air—provides what neuroscientists call "environmental enrichment." This has been shown to enhance memory formation and cognitive flexibility.

Going Further: The NotebookLM Boost

Once I got comfortable with basic AI walking tutorials, I discovered another variation using Google's NotebookLM.

Here's how it works: you upload documents, research papers, PDFs, or YouTube videos that you want to learn from to NotebookLM, and it will create a personalized podcast discussion about them.

The conversation about your content between two AI hosts is surprisingly natural, highlighting important details and establishing connections you might not have noticed.

NotebookLM now even allows you to interrupt the podcast and ask questions, combining the power of active curiosity I discovered on my walk.

These days, I begin many my learning walks by spending the first fifteen minutes listening to a podcast produced by NotebookLM, and then spend the remaining time having direct conversations with ChatGPT or Perplexity.

This provides me with both foundational context as a primer and an opportunity to actively engage with the topic, resulting in a multi-layered learning experience that activates various cognitive processes.

The outcome? I'm taking part in a multifaceted investigation of concepts rather than merely consuming information.

Why This Is Important for More Than Just Learning Efficiency

Over the past few weeks, as I've experimented with AI walking tutorials, I've come to the realization that this technique represents something more than just a learning hack. It stands for an alternative perspective on AI that maintains and strengthens human agency rather than replacing it.

As I've written about previously, we all need to claim our own personal agency in the age of AI, using it to sharpen our critical thinking skills rather than let them passively atrophy.

When I walk and talk with AI, I'm not outsourcing my thought process; rather, I'm leveraging the technology to engage more deeply with ideas while enhancing my ability to be curious and learn.

The questions I ask while walking are often better than the questions I'd think to type at my desk.

The movement seems to unlock a more intuitive, exploratory method of inquiry.

I'm honing my critical thinking and questioning skills, which are precisely the human abilities that become more valuable a world where AI is ever present.

What I'm Learning About AI Collaboration

Through these walking conversations, I'm discovering that we can use AI to become more curious, not less. The key insight is treating AI as a thinking partner rather than an answer machine, an increasingly important shift as we navigate how to work with these tools.

When I'm walking and asking questions of AI, I'm engaging in a collaborative exploration, not merely looking for information.

I'm driving the investigation with my questions, my connections, and my sense of what's intriguing or crucial to investigate further, even though the AI offers knowledge and perspective.

Compared to the passive consumption that permeates most of our digital interactions, this feels markedly different.

I'm actively creating understanding through conversation and movement rather than merely scrolling through feeds or clicking through articles.

This is the power of intentionally using AI to enhance my human curiosity, rather than replace it.

The Broader Application

While I started with neuroscience, I've since used this approach to explore everything from marketing concepts to philosophy. It can be applied to any subject you genuinely curious about.

While one benefit of this approach is fitting more learning into my busy day, efficiency isn't the true power. It's in the level of involvement.

My desire to learn has been rekindled by Walking with AI in a way that feels joyful and sustainable rather than obligatory and taxing.

This practice offers something different in a world where we are continuously consuming information: the opportunity to actually process and integrate new concepts while navigating the physical world.

Your Turn to Try

I'm curious what you'll discover if you try this approach. What topic have you been wanting to understand better? What would happen if you took AI for a walk to explore it?

The beauty of this practice is its simplicity. You don't need special equipment or complicated systems.

Just curiosity, a smartphone, and the willingness to step outside your usual learning environment.

Try it this week: Put your AI assistant in voice mode, choose a topic you've been meaning to learn more about, and start a conversation.

You'll discover that moving your body is sometimes the best way to feed your mind.

Sometimes, the best learning happens not in front of a screen, but while walking down the street, asking questions that matter to you, to an AI that's willing to think alongside you.

This is what learning looks like when technology serves curiosity rather than replacing it. This is how we stay human while getting smarter.

What topic will you explore on your first AI walking tutorial? I'd love to hear about your discoveries! What questions led you to the most interesting insights?

Leave a comment

Know someone who’s looking to integrate more learning into their day?

Share

Subscribe now

But at the time, I completely missed it. I quickly and efficiently responded with some straightforward advice, not acknowledging how vulnerable it was to reach out.

I didn't realize the chance I missed until I sat down to write this.

That moment made me realize that I'm not the only one going through this. In our digital age, many of us think that empathy is fading away due to endless scrolling, AI chatbots, and emoji-filled responses.

But new research shows something surprising: empathy is making a comeback after years of decline.

The catch is... every day, our ability to connect with others in a real way is being attacked.

And as AI gets better at pretending to be compassionate, the real question isn't whether empathy is going away, but whether we're ready to protect and grow it in a world where even machines can fake it.

Subscribe now

Is Empathy Making a Comeback?

For years, headlines warned of a "empathy recession," especially among young people growing up surrounded by digital noise. We saw teenagers pick screens over talking to each other, saw online bullying get worse, and felt like our ability to connect deeply was somehow fading.

But here's what we missed: a major study by researchers at Indiana University's Lilly Family School of Philanthropy showed that young Americans' empathy has been steadily rising since 2008. The research indicates that younger generations are becoming more compassionate, not less.

This rebound teaches us something very important: empathy is not a limited resource that is lost to technology. It is a capacity that changes based on social and cultural forces. It can be made stronger or weaker, grown or left to whither.

But before we get too excited, we need to face a harder truth: even though empathy may be improving at a societal level, our ability to connect with others on a personal level is under attack by technology all the time.

The Slow, Passive Erosion

The threat to empathy isn't some dramatic tipping point; it's the compounding effect of small changes over time.

I've noticed it in everyday moments:

• How I'd write quick replies to emotionally heavy messages without really taking in what someone was saying

• How I'd see a headline about a tragedy and immediately scroll past it, my brain already moving on to the next dopamine hit

• How I'd have trouble focusing when people took too long to explain their feelings

The research backs up my experience.

Online interactions lack the nonverbal symphony that carries most of the emotional meaning. The slight pause before speaking, the way someone's shoulders drop when they're relieved, and the micro-expressions that show vulnerability.

We're trying to read people's emotions through a digital keyhole, and then we wonder why we can't see the whole picture.

Researchers call this "thin empathy": quick, shallow emotional responses that seem meaningful but aren't.

I realized that I had been doing this all the time: seeing someone's carefully curated highlight reel, reacting with a heart emoji, and pretending that gesture communicated a real understanding.

At the same time, the algorithm was feeding into my existing beliefs, creating what have been called "echo chambers" that make it harder to really understand perspectives different than our own.

And this constant flow of information has a way of numbing us and creating "empathy fatigue."

When we see endless suffering, injustice, and crisis all compressed into an endless feed of bite-sized updates, our emotional systems go into protective mode.

We become numb not because we don't care, but because caring about everything means caring deeply about nothing.

I began to refer to this as "empathy drift": a slow, virtually undetectable loss of our own emotional intelligence and our ability to connect with others.

We don't lose the ability to empathize; we just forget how to do it over time.

Why This Matters More Than Ever

As the world rushes to adopt AI, empathy isn't just a nice thing to have; it's what keeps us human.

Machines are great at processing data and getting the optimizing results, but they can't understand how someone else feels. They can't hold space for grief, share real joy, or offer a healing presence.

Empathy is not just about understanding feelings. It’s about feeling the understanding.

Empathy is the foundation of any meaningful relationship. It's what makes teammates trust each other, parents and children bond, and leaders and teams connect.

It turns a group of people into a community, a workplace into a place of belonging, and a conversation into a moment of understanding between two people.

Without empathy, we risk becoming islands of efficiency in an ocean of isolation—productive, perhaps, but profoundly alone.

The Traditional Toolkit Still Works, But It's Not Enough

The good news is that we know how to build empathy.

Face-to-face interaction is still the gold standard. It's those unfiltered moments when we can truly connect with the full emotion another experiences.

Active listening, in which we not only hear words but also their meaning, is still a critical capacity.

In addition, mindfulness practices help us become more aware of our own feelings, which helps us to recognize those feelings in others.

And it turns out, empathy is a learned skill.

Research has proven out that programs that teach emotional intelligence show remarkable results. Simple exercises like imagining the situation from another's viewpoint can measurably increase empathy.

The Digital Divide

The problem is many of these practices don't match the digital reality we live in.

No one teaches us how to listen with empathy over a screen or how to write a text message that shows we care.

Meanwhile we are having hundreds or even thousands of digital interactions each day. Emails with coworkers, texts with family, and social media conversations with friends.

Each of these is an opportunity to show empathy and build connection, but we lack the skills to navigate them with emotional intelligence.

Every day, we miss chances to connect more deeply because we don't know how to turn empathy into text and pixels.

But here's the good news: AI, the technology some worry will replace human connection, is actually becoming a helpful tool for building it—precisely because it can meet us where we are in our digital lives.

AI as an Unlikely Partner for Empathy Training

When I started digging into the research on AI and empathy, it challenged my preconceived notions about technology's role in human connection.

The Research

A study published in Communications Psychology found that people rated AI responses as more compassionate and responsive than those from humans, including trained experts.

Remarkably, this preference held even when told they were reading AI-generated responses.

AI-generated empathy was not only competitive with human empathy; it frequently excelled in the language of care.

In an earlier study published in Nature Machine Intelligence, researchers used AI to coach volunteers in real time in peer-to-peer mental health support, suggesting better ways to rephrase their messages that would make them feel more accepted and supported. The results were surprising:

• A 20% rise in conversational empathy overall

• A nearly 40% rise among those who had trouble being empathetic before

AI analyzed thousands of compassionate responses and distilled patterns that make communication more caring.

But here's the most critical insight:

AI isn't replacing human empathy; it's teaching us to express it better.

My Own Experience

Based on the research, I started experimenting with this myself.

When I got a very charged email from someone earlier this week, I asked AI to help me come up with a more caring response because I was having trouble doing so. Not to write it for me, but to help me see what real support might sound like.

The AI told me to acknowledge their specific challenge before offering them solutions, use "I" statements to avoid prescriptive, and ask what kind of help would be most useful instead of assuming I knew.

My response went from "problem solving" to "relationship building."

It wasn't just that the message was different; it was also how the process made me slow down and think about what he was experiencing.

In Our Organizations

Schools are now using AI-powered platforms and virtual reality simulations to teach kids how to see things from other people's points of view and how to be aware of their own emotions. This has led to measurable improvements in student outcomes.

Companies like Bank of America are using AI to help their workers get better at talking to customers and practicing tough conversations.

A clear pattern is emerging: AI is great at finding the language patterns and communication strategies that help people connect, and then teaching us how to use those tools.

The Principle of Partnership

AI doesn't create empathy; it amplifies our existing capacity. The technology sees patterns in compassionate communication and helps us apply those patterns.

AI works best as a training partner, not as a replacement. It can help us practice more empathetic responses, suggest more caring language, and provide us feedback. But it can't feel what we feel or build the real relationships that sustain us.

The best uses of AI combine it with human judgment and practice in the real world. We use the technology to build and develop skills; and then we apply those skills in our real-life relationships with people. We use AI's pattern recognition ability to learn the language of empathy, and then we speak that language with our own voice and heart.

This is empathy augmentation, not empathy automation.

What I'm Learning to Do Differently

It's not about picking between digital and analog, or AI and human connection. It's about being purposeful with all of our tools.

With Digital Technology:

I've started using AI as a practice partner, not a replacement.

Rather than fire off a pointed email, I'll put my draft into ChatGPT and ask, "How could this be more empathetic while still being direct?" The AI often points out when I'm being defensive or when I could acknowledge the other person's perspective more clearly. Then I rewrite the message in my own words, using what I learned.

With Human Connection:

I'm actively looking for more high-touch interaction opportunities, even though it "just sending a text" would be easy.

More and more often, I'm trying to put my phone in another room to create space for real connection withy my kids. It's not because I'm against technology; it's because I've noticed that I listen better when I'm not subconsciously waiting for the next notification.

I'm constantly working on "active listening": thinking about what I hear before I respond. At first, it feels awkward, but it creates moments of connection I otherwise may have missed.

With Myself:

I am learning to be more aware of my own feelings by doing quick "empathy check-ins" while I write in my journal in the morning.

I try to stay conscious of "empathy fatigue": feeling emotionally numb when I read the news or automatically scroll past content about suffering instead of feeling moved by it.

When I see these patterns, I make a point of taking breaks from information overload and try to be curious about what other people are experiencing instead of rushing to judgement.

It's still a work in progress. Some days I get it right, and other days I fall back into old habits. But I'm learning that empathy, like any other skill, gets better the more you practice.

The Future of Human Connection

It would be easy to keep passively connecting through emojis and comments on one another’s social feeds. Until one day, someone needs us, and we answer with silence.

We're living through a strange paradox…

As AI gets better at imitating human empathy, the value of real human connection grows.

AI can show us how to be empathetic, but it can't replace empathy's authenticity and heart.

The research showing empathy's resurgence gives me hope that this capacity won't be lost—it's something we can learn, train, and recover.

I'm hopeful that, both as individuals and as organizations, we'll choose to cultivate empathy actively, using every tool at our disposal—including AI—to become more connected, more understanding, and more fully human.

In a world where machines can simulate compassion, the humans who thrive will be those who embody it. That's not a threat to worry about—it's a reminder of what should keep us uniquely human.

Later this week, I’ll share some practical tips on using AI to practice empathy, so please subscribe.

Subscribe now

Know anyone struggling with how to interpret that last text message or send a more thoughtfully crafted email?

Share

How are you practicing empathy in an increasingly digital world?

Leave a comment

For the third time that morning, I had asked ChatGPT to revise the strategy document I was working on. "Make this section more compelling," I had suggested. "Actually, the tone is wrong here." Next, "Can you add more data to support this point?"

Every revision felt like I was playing editorial whack-a-mole. Fix one thing and break another. The document was becoming longer, but not better. And I was becoming frustrated.

That's when I realized I wasn't collaborating with AI. I was simply managing it.

I'd asked AI to create the entire first draft, then spent my time cycling through rounds of feedback rather than determining what was correct. I had turned myself into a quality control inspector. No wonder the work felt hollow.

Netflix Summary of What You Missed

If you haven't read Part 1, here's what you should know: we're in the midst of a massive, uncontrolled experiment on human cognition. AI has eliminated the friction associated with cognitive offloading, which is the use of tools to reduce mental effort. The result? We are automating not only tasks, but also the experiences that shape our most fundamental human abilities. We are losing our tolerance for productive struggle, deep curiosity, and the ability to sit with complex problems long enough to gain genuine insight.

But, as I've learned since writing Part 1, the problem isn't AI. The problem is human passivity.

Subscribe now

The Trap: Generate and Done.

Most people use AI in the same way I did that frustrating morning. They fall into what I call the "Generate and Done" trap: ask AI for something, accept the first output, make a few surface edits, and call it finished.

This feels efficient. It appears productive. But it's cognitive quicksand.

When you delegate thinking to AI and position yourself as an editor, you are opting yourself out of the mental processes that generate insight, connection, and genuine understanding. You get outputs that sound smart (though often generic) but feel hollow because they aren't truly yours.

The work lacks your perspective, your voice, and your hard-earned experience-based insights. Worse, you are not gaining any new insights from the process. You're simply quality-controlling someone else's thinking.

The Solution: Active Collaboration Through Generate, Critique, and Refine

Real collaboration with AI necessitates a fundamentally different strategy. Rather than Generate and Done, try three stages:

1. Generate: Generate ideas, explore possibilities, and gather insights.

2. Critique: Challenge assumptions, identify flaws, and consider alternatives.

3. Refine: Improve based on feedback, iterate, and strengthen thinking.

The magic happens by cycling through this process. Each loop keeps you mentally engaged as an active thinking partner, not a passive consumer of AI outputs.

This isn't just about getting better results (I promise, you will). It's about preserving the cognitive processes that make you human while putting AI to work to improve them.

So what does this look like in practice?

Seven Tools for Collaborating with AI

Using specific techniques, you can stay actively engaged throughout the Generate, Critique, and Refine cycle. Here are the seven that I've found most effective: (while outlined by phase, each tool can be used in any phase)

💭 GENERATE PHASE

Generate initial ideas, explore possibilities, and gain insights

Curiosity Preservation: Questions Before Answers

Instead of asking AI for answers, direct it to generate questions. When researching a new topic, such as the relationship between attention and creativity, ask yourself "I'm interested in the relationship between attention and creativity. What questions about attention and creativity should I be investigating?" rather than "How does attention affect creativity?".

The questions that arise frequently reveal perspectives you had not previously considered and spark connections between ideas that would not have occurred in a more direct Q&A format.

Think-Aloud Co-Creation: Shared Reasoning

Share your reasoning process with AI and ask it to think with you. When developing a new insight (such as the link between AI usage and cognitive muscle atrophy), walk AI through your thinking: "Here's what I've noticed about how instant answers may reduce our tolerance for uncertainty. What connections am I missing? "What questions does this raise?"

This method allows you to flesh out concepts more fully while retaining ownership of the core insight.

🔎 CRITIQUE PHASE

Challenge assumptions, identify flaws, and explore alternatives.

Self-Critique: Question everything

Present your ideas to AI and explicitly ask it to challenge, critique, or identify flaws. When I was creating the framework for this series, I asked: "I'm arguing that cognitive offloading causes mental atrophy. Challenge this as strongly as you can. What am I missing?"

The response prompted me to consider positive aspects of cognitive offloading that I had previously overlooked, such as how it could free up mental resources for higher-order thinking. That critique strengthened my argument by allowing me to acknowledge nuance rather than taking an absolutist stance.

Role-Based Prompting: Multiple Perspectives

Give AI a specific persona to emulate. This increases cognitive diversity in your thinking. For this article, I asked AI to respond as a skeptical knowledge worker: "What would you be most concerned about with these techniques?" The feedback assisted me in addressing practical implementation challenges that I had not previously considered.

Multi-Lens Framing: Stakeholder Analysis

Ask AI to analyze the same issue from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders at the same time. After completing the initial outline for this piece, I asked, "What perspectives might I be missing? "Who might disagree with my approach, and why?"

The responses focused on skeptical users who believe their current AI usage is "good enough", as well as time-conscious users who prioritize immediate productivity over long-term cognitive development. Based on that feedback, I made specific changes that addressed the "this seems like extra work" objection head on.

⚡ REFINE PHASE

Improve based on feedback, iterate, and strengthen your thinking

Memory Assist: Connect with Your Past

Use AI to connect your current thinking to previous insights and experiences. When working on a complex project, you may wonder: "Based on my previous experience with similar challenges, what patterns or lessons should I be considering here?".

This allows you to see patterns throughout your work and ensures that new ideas complement rather than contradict your existing knowledge.

Socratic Prompting: Question for Refinement

Instead of asking AI for solutions, ask it to pose questions that will help you refine your thinking. "What questions should I be asking myself about my audience's real challenges?" puts you in control of your thinking, while AI assists you in exploring your own reasoning.

How It All Works Together: An Actual Example

Let me walk you through how I used the entire cycle to develop the series' central argument.

Generate Phase: I began with curiosity preservation: "What questions should I be asking about how AI is changing human thinking?" This raised questions about cognitive dependencies, skill atrophy, and the link between effort and satisfaction. Then I used think-aloud co-creation to dig deeper into these connections.

Critique Phase: I used role-based prompting, asking AI to respond as a technology optimist: "Confront my concerns about cognitive offloading. What benefits would an AI optimist say I missing?" This helped me understand how, when used strategically, automation can free up space for higher-order thinking.

Refine Phase: I used socratic prompting, asking "What questions does this framework raise that I should investigate?" Along with memory assistance: "How does this connect to other research on learning and expertise development?"

The end result was not only a better argument, but also a deeper understanding. I remained actively engaged throughout the process, taking advantage of AI's ability to bring to light perspectives that I may have overlooked.

What to Automate and What to Augment

This approach requires being strategic in deciding when to use active collaboration versus simple automation.

Automate freely:

• Data collection

• Format conversion

• Basic research

• Routine administrative tasks

These tasks do not increase cognitive capacity, so offloading them makes room for more meaningful work.

Augment thoughtfully:

• Creative problem-solving

• Strategic thinking

• Learning new skills

• Complex analysis

• Anything that deeply matters to you or motivates you, personally or professionally

The main question is, "Will offloading this preserve or diminish my thinking capacity?"

Why This is More Important Than Productivity

Working this way requires about 20% more time upfront, but it produces fundamentally better results:

• Improve decision-making through thorough exploration and critique.

• Gain deeper insights by discovering connections that neither you nor AI would reach alone.

• Preserve cognitive muscles through active collaboration rather than passive consumption.

• Express yourself authentically through your unique perspective and experience.

A New Form of AI Literacy

We're creating a new type of AI literacy: not just the ability to use AI tools, but also the wisdom to know when and how to engage them as thought partners rather than replacements.

The humans who thrive in an AI-augmented world will have learned to use technology to become more human, not less. Like physical fitness in an age of cars and elevators, technology has the potential to make us stronger or weaker depending on how we use it.

Those who use it purposefully to challenge and develop their abilities will have a significant advantage over those who use it solely for convenience.

The Choice is Ours

The choice is simple but not easy: let AI think for us or think with AI.

When working on important tasks, such as developing new insights, solving complex problems, or creating something meaningful, the Generate → Critique → Refine cycle ensures that your thinking remains authentic, enhanced but not replaced by artificial intelligence.

This is how we regain cognitive agency in an automated world. This is how we think better, not necessarily faster.

The distinction will shape what it means to be human in the age of artificial intelligence.

Subscribe now

Know someone who could benefit from using AI with more intention?

Share

What is your experience with AI as a thinking partner? I'd love to hear about the strategies you've developed for staying cognitively engaged while using these powerful tools.

Leave a comment

Subscribe

I miss the rush from solving problems. You know that moment when everything clicks? When you lean back in your chair with that satisfying "I figured it out" feeling?

Now I just ask ChatGPT (or Claude, Gemini, Grok, …)

With all of these amazing new tools at our disposal, it’s hard not to turn to them with any unknown or challenging problem. It dawned on me that I have started to turn to AI almost any time I don’t have an answer or solution to a problem top of mind. The discomfort of not instantly knowing something now has a solution. But then it hit me…

When did I become someone who outsources his own thinking?

I'm not alone. We've all made this trade: intellectual satisfaction for efficiency. And we're starting to notice what we've lost. Remember when figuring something out felt energizing rather than draining? When wrestling with complexity left you accomplished, not depleted?

"Just Google it" became "Let ChatGPT handle it." Our outputs look better than ever, but something deeper is happening. We're losing touch with our own cognitive agency.

This isn't about technology being bad. Anyone who knows me knows I’m a technophile and huge proponent of AI. It's about the invisible cost of convenience.

The most important question isn't whether AI can think—it's whether we'll still want to.

The Friction Factor

Cognitive offloading is the practice of using external tools to reduce the mental workload on our brains. This concept isn’t new. Examples include:

• Maps instead of memorizing routes

• Notes instead of trusting memory

• Calculators instead of mental math

But here's what changed: the friction disappeared.

Before, cognitive offloading required deliberate action. You had to unfold a map, pull out a calculator, look something up in a book. That pause (however brief) created natural boundaries around when and how much we offloaded.

AI eliminated that friction entirely.

The tool is always there, always instant, always seductive in its convenience. The threshold for offloading dropped to nearly zero.

I'm not troubled that AI can help us think.

I'm troubled that we may stop thinking altogether.

The Efficiency Trap

Here's the strange thing about our quest for cognitive efficiency: we're optimizing for speed while undermining the outcomes we actually want.

Faster answers ≠ better thinking ≠ more fulfillment.

Research on "desirable difficulties" by psychologist Robert Bjork shows the opposite: struggle creates stronger learning and deeper engagement. The effort isn't a bug—it's a feature.

Think about the last time you felt genuinely proud of solving a problem.

I bet it wasn't because the solution came quickly or easily. It was because you worked through complexity, wrestled with uncertainty, arrived at understanding through effort. That process (the very thing AI offers to eliminate) is where satisfaction lives.

We've created an efficiency trap: when convenience becomes cognitive quicksand.

We sink deeper into passivity with each effortless answer, mistaking productivity for progress and speed for intelligence.

The question isn't whether AI can make us more efficient. It can.

The question is whether efficiency is what we're truly after.

Your Brain on Autopilot

Your brain physically changes based on how you use it. Neural pathways that get regular use strengthen and grow. Those that don't get used weaken and are pruned away.

Use it or lose it isn't metaphor—it's neuroscience.

The Evidence is Compelling:

Navigation and GPS: A 2020 meta-analysis by Miola et al. in Neuropsychology Review analyzed studies across multiple populations and found consistent evidence that regular GPS users show reduced spatial memory and navigation ability. Brain imaging studies reveal decreased gray matter density in the hippocampus (the brain region crucial for spatial navigation) among habitual GPS users.

We're not just losing the skill to navigate without a computer. We're losing the neural infrastructure that supports it.

Mental Arithmetic: Functional MRI studies show that students who rely heavily on calculators demonstrate reduced activation in brain regions associated with number processing, particularly the intraparietal sulcus. A longitudinal study by Grabner et al. (2009) in NeuroImage found that intensive calculator use led to measurable decreases in mental math abilities and corresponding changes in brain activation patterns during arithmetic tasks.

Executive Functions: Adele Diamond's research at UBC has demonstrated through randomized controlled trials that executive functions—attention control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility—strengthen with targeted practice and weaken without it. Her 2013 review in Annual Review of Psychology emphasizes that "repeated practice is key" for cognitive gains.

Crucially, neuroplasticity works both ways: what we don't use, we lose.

If basic cognitive skills atrophy when we outsource them to technology, and AI makes cognitive offloading frictionless, what happens to the complex thinking skills that make us human?

We're conducting a massive, uncontrolled experiment on human cognition.

I'm one of the test subjects.

We all are.

Subscribe

Four Ways We're Losing Ourselves

When we use AI passively—as a replacement rather than a thinking partner—we face four interconnected risks:

1. Deskilling

We lose competencies we once had. Skills atrophy through disuse, and AI makes it easier than ever to stop practicing the cognitive abilities that define human intelligence.

2. Disengagement

Work becomes less intrinsically motivating. When AI handles the interesting parts (the problem-solving, the creative thinking, the intellectual challenge) we're left with mechanical tasks that drain rather than energize us.

3. Superficial Thinking

We get answers without understanding. AI can provide solutions, but it can't provide the deep comprehension that comes from working through problems ourselves. We risk becoming dependent on insights we can't recreate or truly grasp.

4. Atrophy of Curiosity

We lose our capacity to sit with questions, to wonder, to explore mystery.

Curiosity requires tolerance for not-knowing, for questions that don't have immediate answers. When we can always ask AI instead of wondering, we lose our capacity for sustained inquiry—the very capacity that drives learning, innovation, and meaning-making.

These risks compound. As we become deskilled → we become more dependent on AI → we become less engaged → our thinking becomes more superficial → our curiosity atrophies.

The cycle deepens.

What's Really at Stake

The more I researched this, the more I noticed my own cognitive shortcuts.

We're not just automating tasks; we're automating the very experiences that build our most essential human capacities.

Interpersonal Communication

When we use AI to craft our messages, we skip the mental work of thinking through how someone might receive our words. This is a thought process that builds empathy and social intelligence. AI writing may sound polished, but it reduces our communication skills and eliminates the practice of emotional attunement that comes from crafting our own words for delicate situations.

We lose the experience of considering another person's perspective, their emotional state, their likely reaction. That consideration (that mental modeling of another human being) is how we develop deeper understanding of others and stronger relationships.

Creative Expression

AI-generated content reduces our practice in developing original ideas and finding our unique voice. Using AI for creative work eliminates the productive struggle that leads to breakthrough insights and personal artistic growth. When we outsource ideation to AI, we reduce our tolerance for the uncertainty and iteration that drives true innovation.

More important, we lose the deeply personal satisfaction that comes from creating something uniquely ours.

The muscle of making unexpected connections between disparate ideas (perhaps the most distinctly human cognitive ability) atrophies when AI does the connecting for us.

Curiosity and Deep Learning

When we use AI for learning and skill development, we replace the productive struggle and discovery process that builds true expertise. The joy of intellectual curiosity gets swapped for efficient information retrieval. We lose our tolerance for not-knowing and productive discomfort—the very friction that drives genuine learning.

Curiosity requires:

• Sitting with questions that don't have immediate answers

• Following threads of interest without knowing where they lead

• Developing our own understanding through sustained engagement with complexity

When we can always ask AI instead of wondering, we lose our capacity for the kind of sustained inquiry that leads to wisdom rather than just information.

The Real Problem

The problem isn't AI.

The problem is passivity. Treating AI like a replacement rather than a thinking partner.

I don't want to become someone who can use AI but has forgotten how to think. That's why I'm exploring what it means to work WITH artificial intelligence while staying unmistakably, irreplaceably human.

We stand at an inflection point. AI can either enhance our human capabilities or replace them. The difference lies not in the technology itself, but in how consciously we choose to engage with it.

The question isn't whether to use AI—that ship has sailed.

The question is whether we'll use it in ways that make us more human or less so.

→ In Part 2, we'll explore how to stay in the cognitive driver's seat and use AI in ways that sharpen your mind instead of dulling it.

Subscribe

This is the first part of a two-part series on cognitive offloading in the age of AI. In Part 2, we’ll explore specific tools for reclaiming your cognitive edge—practices that help you stay sharp, engaged, and unmistakably human while working with AI.

Know someone who may be leaning too much on AI for their thinking? Or someone who is struggling with what to use AI for and what not to?

Share

Have you noticed yourself avoiding hard challenges and jumpy too quickly to AI? I’d love to hear your experience.

Comment

Interested in connecting on how we reclaim what makes us human in the age of AI?

I was guilty of this too.

The problem is that we're still operating with what I call the "Google mental model" - where humans request information and computers provide it. This approach severely limits what's possible when working with today's AI tools.

The Missed Opportunity

When we treat AI as merely a question-answering machine, we're missing out on its potential as a thought partner. We're using a Ferrari as if it were a bicycle.

Based on insights from innovation experts Jeremy Utley and Ethan Mollick, I've completely transformed how I approach these interactions. The results have been eye-opening - more nuanced responses, better solutions to complex problems, and genuinely surprising insights I wouldn't have discovered otherwise.

Introducing the SPARK Framework

To transform your AI interactions from transactional exchanges to meaningful collaborations, I've developed the SPARK framework:

S - Set a Goal

Clearly define what you want to achieve. Rather than asking a simple question, frame your interaction around a specific outcome.

Instead of: "What strategies work for product launches?"
Try: "I need to develop a launch strategy for our new productivity app targeting remote professionals."

P - Provide Context

Share relevant details about your situation. The more context you provide, the more tailored and useful the response will be.

Instead of: "What are good marketing channels for a productivity app?"
Try: "For our productivity app launch, we have a small team of 5, a $30K marketing budget, and 3 months to prepare. Our app integrates with Slack and Microsoft Teams, and we've already secured 200 beta users who've provided positive feedback."

A - Assign a Role

Tell the AI what expertise it should adopt. This helps frame its approach and can dramatically change the quality and focus of responses.

Instead of: Letting the AI respond to your productivity app questions as a general assistant
Try: "You're a product marketing director who has successfully launched productivity SaaS products at both startups and established companies like Atlassian and Asana."

R - Reveal Your Role

Define how you'll actively participate in the conversation. This establishes expectations and creates more productive back-and-forth.

Instead of: Passively receiving advice about your app launch
Try: "Ask me specific questions about our target market, competitive landscape, and available marketing channels so you can tailor your recommendations."

K - Keep It Conversational

Make it a dialogue, not a one-off exchange. The real magic happens when you engage in multiple turns of conversation.

Instead of: Ending the conversation after getting initial productivity app launch strategies
Try: "After you suggest launch strategies, I'll share our budget limitations and marketing team composition to refine the approach."

SPARK in Action: From Personal Decisions to Business Strategy

A Simple Personal Example

Recently, my wife and I were considering getting a dog for our family. Our first instinct was to ask a simple question:

"What kind of dogs are good around kids?"

But instead, we applied the SPARK framework:

Set a Goal: "I need help deciding what type of dog we should consider getting for our family."

Provide Context: "We are a family of six with young kids. We tend to be away from the house a few hours a day. We have a yard and would like a dog that can play with the kids. Our oldest child has mild allergies to some animals."

Assign a Role: "You're an expert on dogs and the various needs and temperaments of different breeds. Your job is to help match families with the best dogs based on the needs of both the family and the dog."

Reveal Your Role: "Ask me questions about our family lifestyle, preferences, and constraints to help determine which breeds would be the best match for us."

Keep It Conversational: We then had a productive dialogue where the AI asked about:

• Our experience with dogs

• How much time we could dedicate to training

• Our activity levels

• Space constraints in our home

• Grooming preferences

• Size considerations

With each answer, the AI refined its understanding and eventually provided us with a thoughtful list of breeds we hadn't even considered, along with detailed explanations of why each would be a good match for our specific situation.

Applying SPARK in Business

The same framework can deliver even more value in professional contexts. Imagine a team needing to revamp their customer onboarding process. Instead of asking:

"What are best practices for SaaS customer onboarding?"

Here's how they could apply SPARK:

Set a Goal: "I need to redesign our customer onboarding process to improve our 30-day retention rate, which currently sits at 65%."

Provide Context: "We have a B2B productivity app with a 14-day free trial. Users need to connect their work calendar and task management tools to see value. Currently, only 40% complete all integration steps. Our support team is small with just two customer success managers handling all accounts."

Assign a Role: "You're a customer success director who has optimized onboarding flows at companies like Calendly and Monday.com, achieving 90%+ activation rates and significant improvements in retention."

Reveal Your Role: "Ask me questions about our current onboarding flow, user feedback, and technical constraints so you can provide targeted recommendations."

Keep It Conversational: This would lead to a productive dialogue where the AI might ask about:

• Current drop-off points in the onboarding funnel

• Existing customer feedback on the process

• Technical limitations for integration simplification

• Resources available for implementation

• Current metrics and measurement practices

With each answer, the AI is refining its understanding and working with you to co-create an onboarding redesign strategy, including specific intervention points, communication templates, and a phased implementation plan.

This framework scales naturally from everyday decisions to complex business challenges. In both cases, the quality of insights are dramatically better than what you'd receive from simple queries.

Beyond Simple Questions

I've applied this framework to even more complex scenarios:

• Working through strategic decisions by assigning the AI the role of various stakeholders (customer, competitor, etc.) to pressure-test my thinking

• Improving my writing by having the AI play the role of different audience members and providing feedback from multiple perspectives

• Exploring complex problems by having the AI represent experts from different backgrounds (neuroscience, behavioral science, sociology, and philosophy) and facilitate a structured debate

In each case, the quality of insight was dramatically better than what I would have received from a simple query.

The Shift in Mindset

Using the SPARK framework requires a fundamental shift in how we think about AI tools:

1. From answer provider to thought partner: The AI becomes a collaborator in your thinking process, not just a source of information.

2. From transaction to relationship: Each interaction builds on previous exchanges, creating a richer context for better results.

3. From passive consumption to active co-creation: You remain engaged and responsible for guiding the conversation toward valuable outcomes.

Getting Started with SPARK

You don't need to use all elements of the framework for every interaction. Start small:

• For your next factual question, add context about why you need the information

• When seeking advice, specify what role or expertise you want the AI to adopt

• After receiving an initial response, follow up with a clarifying question instead of ending the conversation

Over time, incorporating these elements will become second nature, and you'll find yourself having increasingly valuable exchanges.

The Cost-Benefit Calculation

Yes, using the SPARK framework takes more effort than firing off quick queries. It requires thoughtfulness about your goal, careful articulation of context, and ongoing engagement.

But consider the trade-off: a few extra minutes of setup for significantly more valuable and tailored insights. In many cases, this investment pays dividends in better decisions, more creative solutions, and deeper understanding.

Beyond Individual Use

This approach isn't just valuable for personal use. Organizations can benefit enormously by training teams to interact with AI tools using structured frameworks like SPARK:

• Product teams can explore design alternatives more thoroughly

• Marketing can generate more targeted campaign concepts

• Customer service can develop more nuanced response templates

• Strategy teams can pressure-test assumptions from multiple angles

The companies that master these collaborative approaches will gain significant advantages in creativity, problem-solving, and decision-making.

The Future of Human-AI Collaboration

As AI systems continue to advance, the ability to engage with them effectively will become an increasingly valuable skill. The most successful individuals won't be those who can craft the perfect one-shot prompt, but those who can maintain productive, iterative dialogues that leverage both human and artificial intelligence.

The SPARK framework is just the beginning. As we develop better methods for collaboration with AI systems, we'll unlock new possibilities for enhancing human creativity, decision-making, and problem-solving.

Don't just prompt. SPARK a real exchange.

Share

According to a new Harvard Business Review article, yes. In a series of experiments, people who leaned on generative tools produced higher-quality emails, reviews, and idea lists, BUT motivation dropped (11%) and boredom jumped (20%) when participants were forced to tackle the next task on their own without the help of AI.

While that dip may seem small, over time and the additive effect of many tasks it has a huge impact. If we start to outsource the challenging aspects of our work, the workweek starts to feel like scrolling… lots of output, but very little ownership.

Why the slump shows up

Challenge is fuel. Creative labor lights up the same reward circuits as puzzle-solving and sport. Strip out the struggle, and you also strip away the chemical cocktail of dopamine, norepinephrine, a touch of adrenaline that tells the brain, this matters.

Role reversal. Automation flips us from builders and creators to editors. Human-Factors researchers call it the irony of automation: systems take over the interesting parts and leave people monitoring the leftovers.

Shrinking autonomy. Self-Determination Theory says motivation thrives on autonomy, competence, and connection. One-click text blocks in a chat window rob us of all three. We decide less, practice fewer skills, and feel less ownership over the product.

Lost creative friction. The most meaningful breakthroughs often emerge from the productive tension of different perspectives pushing against each other. When AI replaces human collaboration, we lose not just the friction that sparks innovation, but the shared struggle that builds trust and team cohesion.

Work with the machine, not for it

To be clear, I’m not suggesting we never use AI for creative work. In full transparency, I absolutely used it in drafting this article. What I am proposing is that we take steps to be very intentional in how we use AI and the roles that we ask it and ourselves to play.

When we treat AI not just as a question and answer bot or ask it to do all the thinking for us, AI can absolutely be a creative thought partner to help us widen our aperture and expand creatively upon our own ideas.

1. Sketch before you prompt. Jot three rough lines, a headline, or a doodle. Create the story and lock in your voice before the assistant starts riffing.

2. Role reversal, make AI interview you to extract your ideas. Tell the AI to take on the role of journalist exploring your idea above. Tell it to treat you as an expert in the field and conduct an interview with you for it to help in drafting. By flipping the paradigm, you own the ideas. AI is just helping you get them on paper.

3. Give the bot the grunt work, not the flavor. Let it pull data, outline structure, or suggest counter-arguments. Claim the hook, the stories, the punchlines.

4. Rewrite at least one pass by hand. Close the tab, let your mind wrestle for fifteen minutes, then reopen and merge drafts. The friction brings insight.

5. Schedule AI-free deep-work blocks. Even one hour a day of pure, device-quiet focus keeps your creative muscles from atrophying.

6. Debrief the experience. After each project, note where you felt inspired by new ideas and perspectives surfaced by AI and what felt like hollowly passing off important work. Adjust the split next time.

Keep Working At It

• Invest in AI literacy. Training should cover not only prompt crafting but also cognitive pitfalls like over-trust and deskilling. Focus on building strategies to pivot the role of AI from automator to creative thought partner.

• Track the feeling metric. Add a one-question pulse survey that asks, "How meaningful did your work feel this week?" Declining scores flag over-automation long before quality slips.

• Dedicate AI-free creating time. Spend time each week working on a creative project without AI to maintain problem-solving muscles.

Meaning is the real KPI

Output metrics will keep climbing as models improve. That is the easy part. The harder part, and the competitive edge for humans leveraging AI, lies in keeping the work worth doing. Leave space for the blank page, the awkward first draft, the debates over ideas. Those moments are rocket fuel for humans.

So the next time a prompt window tempts you to delegate the entire task, pause. Ask yourself which slice of the job gives you a rush when you nail it. Keep that slice. Maybe even ask AI to challenge your thinking and widen your aperture. Then let the bot handle the rest.

Your productivity stats might slip a point or two. But what you gain in return is far more valuable: motivating, fulfilling work that feels like an expression of your humanity rather than an afterthought to automation. In a world increasingly mediated by algorithms, reclaiming these moments of creative agency isn't just personally fulfilling. It's how we continue to bring uniquely human wisdom, empathy, and purpose to the table.

Did you feel a difference the last time you toggled between AI-assisted and solo work? Hit reply, share your story, and let's compare notes on reclaiming the human spark in our digital workflows.

I've spent the last year immersed in AI… watching the headlines, testing the tools, and reflecting on what this moment really means for us as humans.

My own journey with AI began as purely practical. I used it to draft emails and summarize research. And like most everyone else in the early days of AI (i.e. a year ago), I saw immense power to check off easy tasks and get more done in the day. Like with every other prior productivity hack I’d tried, I filled the extra minutes and hours reclaimed with more and more commitments. AI became the ultimate productivity accelerator.

Then came the day I found myself overcome with trying to be the best version of myself in every role I played… husband, father, leader, employee, volunteer… while realizing that doing so required me to take much better care of myself mentally, physically and spiritually. My first reaction to this realization was anxiety. This would require even more of my very limited time.

On a whim, I asked an AI to help me create a framework for decision-making that aligned with my deeper values. The resulting conversation wasn't just productive, it brought a clarity and focus I hadn't expected. I'd accidentally discovered what thousands of others were already finding: AI as a mirror for self-reflection and meaning-making.

So when I saw the April 2025 Harvard Business Review article "How People Are Really Using Gen AI in 2025" by Marc Zao-Sanders, I was fascinated by the findings. [Link to source]

The data reveals a surprising shift in how we're using this technology.

The top 3 AI use cases today according to the research:

1. Therapy/companionship

2. Organizing my life

3. Finding meaning and purpose

Not just coding. Not just marketing content. Not just work automation.

People are increasingly turning to AI to become more focused, intentional, and present.

From Productivity to Presence

This shift marks a new chapter in how we engage with technology.

For years, we've warned about the risks of screens, notifications, social media algorithms, etc. pulling us away from our essential human qualities—attention, empathy, self-awareness.

But something's changed.

Across Reddit threads, forums, and feedback from real users, a different story is emerging:

People are using AI as a mirror—not just a tool.

They're asking it for clarity about goals, help managing competing priorities, and frameworks for making more intentional choices. They're leaning on it to uncover and reflect their own values back to them.

One quote that stuck with from the research:

"One thing I find especially useful is having it give advice on what I should do do next. It's helped me establish my core values, my principles, and my life goals. It's helped me introspect, too - figuring out what I'm all about, what I need to change, how to change. It's helped me declutter my brain, make better plans, make things more achievable."

It's not that AI is making decisions for us. In a world of endless distractions, it's becoming a focusing lens for our attention and intentions.

3 Ways to Use AI as a Mirror Instead of a Tool

If you're curious to try this out for yourself, here are three prompts I've found valuable based on how others are using AI to support focus, meaning, and intentional living:

1. Daily Reflection Partner

Use AI to process your day and increase self-awareness.

Try this prompt:

I'd like to do a 5-minute reflection on my day. Can you guide me with questions about what went well, what challenged me, and where I felt most engaged?

2. Values Alignment

Align your time with what truly matters.

Try this prompt:

Help me create a weekly schedule that reflects my values of family connection, creative work, and health. I have these commitments [list], but want to ensure I'm living according to my priorities.

3. Curiosity Catalyst

Reframe stuck thinking or cultivate deeper presence.

Try this prompt:

I'm feeling scattered about [situation]. What perspectives or possibilities might help me focus on what truly matters here? Help me see this more clearly.

These are small steps—but powerful ones. Used with intention, AI can act like a mirror: reflecting your goals, values, and blind spots back to you in ways that cut through the noise of modern life.

The Human Element We Can't Replace

Of course, there are clear boundaries here. AI doesn't replace the irreplaceable: deep human connections, embodied experiences, or the wisdom that comes from living fully in the world.

What it offers instead is a supplement… a focusing tool available when attention fragments, a meaning-making partner when priorities compete, and a reflection space free from judgment when we're trying to align our actions with our deeper values.

The goal isn't replacement but amplification of our human capacities for presence, focus, and intentional living.

The Paradox of Digital Humanity

Yes, it's ironic.

The very tech we blamed for burnout, distraction, and disconnection… might also be what helps us reclaim focus, meaning, and emotional presence.

Maybe it's not about whether technology is good or bad.

Maybe it's about how we choose to use it.

And maybe, just maybe, this is the beginning of a more human kind of AI story.

Thanks for reading.

If you're exploring how to use AI to live more intentionally, subscribe for future essays on digital wellbeing, reclaiming what makes us human in the age of AI, and the evolving relationship between tech and humanity.

Subscribe now

What do you think—can AI really help us become more focused, intentional humans? I'd love to hear your thoughts.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Leave a comment

If you found this helpful, please consider sharing!

Share